The practice of phenomenology: The case of Max van Manen.

Phenomenological philosophy has influenced empirical science since its inception, but applying it outside philosophy raises questions about how deeply rooted in core phenomenological commitments a qualitative study must be. This paper critiques Max van Manen's work, arguing that his book Phenomenology of Practice is abstruse and excessively complicated rather than a clear, accessible method for non-philosopher researchers. Using nursing as an example, the author outlines a better way to practice and apply phenomenology in non-philosophical contexts.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Since its inception, phenomenological philosophy has exerted an influence on empirical science. But what is the best way to practice, use and apply phenomenology in a non-philosophical context? How deeply rooted in phenomenological philosophy must qualitative research be in order to qualify as phenomenological? How many of the core commitments of phenomenology must it accept? In the following contribution, I will take a closer look at Max van Manen's work. I will argue that van Manen's understanding of and presentation of phenomenology is quite problematic and that his book Phenomenology of Practice rather than amounting to a clear and accessible presentation of the phenomenological method that would make it do-able to researchers who are not themselves professional philosophers is in fact both abstruse and excessively complicated. I will then turn to nursing, and by taking that as my example, outline a better way to apply and practice phenomenology.