Skip to content

Phenomenology as research method or substantive metaphysics? An overview of phenomenology's uses in nursing.

Vicki Earle

Nursing Philosophy October 1, 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-769x.2010.00458.x (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Humans Nursing research Metaphysics Philosophy, nursing
Key points Argues that phenomenology is used ambiguously, conflating a philosophical movement (Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, Merleau-Ponty) with a research method (van Manen's hermeneutic phenomenology), and contends that this blurred boundary influences nursing knowledge development.

Abstract

In exploring phenomenological literature, it is evident that the term 'phenomenology' holds rather different meanings depending upon the context. Phenomenology has been described as both a philosophical movement and an approach to human science research. The phenomenology of Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, and Merleau-Ponty was philosophical in nature and not intended to provide rules or procedures for conducting research. The Canadian social scientist, van Manen, however, introduced specific guidelines for conducting human science research, which is rooted in hermeneutic phenomenology and this particular method has been employed in professional disciplines such as education, nursing, clinical psychology, and law. The purpose of this paper is to explore the difference between the phenomenological method as described by van Manen and that of other philosophers such as Husserl, Heidegger, Gadamer, and Merleau-Ponty. In so doing, the author aims to address the blurred boundaries of phenomenology as a research method and as a philosophical movement and highlight the influence of these blurred boundaries on nursing knowledge development.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics