Fenomenologia, psicologia ed embodiment: a proposito di Filosofia come scienza rigorosa di Edmund Husserl
Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia September 2, 2013 DOI: 10.4453/rifp.2013.0024 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Naturalization Embodied mind Hyle First person experience Neuro-phenomenology. |
| Key points | Argues that phenomenological analysis should not embrace naturalistic presuppositions despite the close relation between empirical and pure subjects, and that current consciousness research is divided between embodied cognition approaches and Husserlian phenomenology. |
Abstract
Phenomenology, Psychology, and Embodiment. Reflections on Edmund Husserl’s Philosophy as a Rigorous Science – The empirical subject psychologists investigate is closely related to the pure subject phenomenologists work on. Because of this, one could think that phenomenological analysis embraces naturalistic presuppositions, even though Husserl decidedly rejected this idea and argued, on the contrary, in favor of epoché, of eidetic research and of the primacy of intentional consciousness. In the current research on consciousness we witness a conflict between the authors supporting an embodied view who think that neurosciences are or will be able to sufficiently explain psychical phenomena and phenomenologists who rely on Husserl’s concept of hyle and conceive a subjectivity sensitive, or a consciousness bound to sensory experience. On first case the search for scientific status leads through the sciences of complexity up to a mathematized psyche, on second case phenomenologists find support in the advancements of the neuroscience.