Theoretical Controversies—Terminological Biases: Consciousness Revisited
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric August 26, 2015 DOI: 10.1515/slgr-2015-0025 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Consciousness Sensorimotor approach Global workspace theory Merleau-ponty |
| Key points | Argues that the linguistic nature of thought creates paradoxical situations that philosophy can identify, and that these paradoxes pose barriers to unifying scientific results, especially regarding consciousness. |
Abstract
Although scientific practice sometimes encounters philosophical difficulties, it cannot shoulder the burden of resolving them. This can lead to controversies. An unavoidable difficulty is rooted in the linguistic attitude, i.e., in the fact that to a considerable extent we express our thoughts in words. I will attempt to illuminate some important characteristics of linguistic expression which lead to paradoxical situations, identifiable thanks to philosophy. In my argument, I will investigate how the notion of consciousness has altered over the course of philosophical investigation and how it relates to recent scientific practice. In conclusion, I will focus on a few recent so-called radical positions in philosophy with regard to a framework within which consciousness and more generally mental phenomena can be regarded in a new light, as well as on the barriers we face when trying to unify scientific results.