Uncanny Brains versus a Lived-Body: Reflections on the “Hard Problem” of Consciousness

Despite impressive neuroscientific achievements, the discipline cannot explain human consciousness—the subjective experience—because consciousness is the only phenomenon in which we have complete confidence. The article suggests that to advance understanding of subjective experience, we must focus on how the body is thrown into the world in the here-and-now.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Abstract The natural sciences seek to explain all natural phenomena, including human beings. This lofty objective encompasses the scientific project in all its glory, within which brain science constitutes an integral part. Essentially, however, neuroscientists not only seek to achieve a greater understanding of how the human brain works but rather, and perhaps mainly, aspire to understand human consciousness, that is, the subjective experience. According to this approach, consciousness is merely brain activity, and thus any progress in the study of the brain represents an advance in the study of consciousness. Yet, despite the many and impressive neuroscientific achievements, when it comes to understanding human consciousness, this discipline cannot deliver the goods. This ongoing failure, so it will be suggested, arouses uncanny anxiety, largely because consciousness is the only phenomenon in which we have complete confidence. The present article suggests that in order to advance our understanding of the subjective experience, we must focus on how the body is thrown into the world in the here-and-now.