Skip to content

A neuroepistemology of mystical experience

Charles D. Laughlin, Adam J. Rock

Transpersonal Psychology Review 2020 DOI: 10.53841/bpstran.2020.22.2.37 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mystical experience
Key points Proposes that a neuroepistemological account of mystical experience can contribute to the constructivist versus decontextualist debate, but faces methodological problems such as phenomenological naiveté.

Abstract

This essay provides an anthropological account of a neuroepistemological account of mystical experience. We commence by outlining the various qualities of mystical experience (e.g. time-consciousness and space-consciousness distortion). Subsequently, we analyse the epistemology of mystical experience with special reference to the constructivist versus decontextualist debate. Next, we formulate a neuroepistemology of mystical experience and demonstrate how this account might contribute to the ongoing discourse between constructivists and decontextualists. Finally, from an anthropological point of view we discuss various methodological problems that may hinder a neuroepistemological account of mystical experience (e.g. phenomenological naiveté). We conclude by outlining the attributes of neuroepistemology of mystical experience researchers required to resolve the aforementioned methodological problems.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mystical experience, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics