Skip to content

Mental Construction: A Shared Framework in Psychology and Husserl-Inspired Model of Intentionality

Chang Liu, Bin Ye

Journal for General Philosophy of Science March 26, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s10838-026-09762-y (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Grounded cognition Embodied cognition
Key points Argues that constructionist theories of emotion and Husserl's Apprehension Model are independent formulations of a single Construction Framework of the Mental (CFM), which treats folk psychological categories as constructs from basic mental processes.

Abstract

Constructionists claim that emotions result from the categorization of a kind of phenomenal character, or what is known as core affect. This categorization takes shape in terms of prior situated experience. Husserl, in turn, suggests that perceptions emerge from the apprehension of a kind of phenomenal character. Similarly, this also takes shape in terms of prior situated experience. Thus, the constructionism of emotion and Husserl’s Apprehension Model can be seen as two independent formulations of one and the same framework. They both provide the Construction Framework of the Mental (CFM). This framework takes most folk psychological categories to be “constructs” built from more basic mental processes. Given the consistency of the constructionist framework of mental states with recent findings in neuroscience and competitive metaphysical positions, along with its application in psychology and phenomenology, this framework for the formation of mental states should be considered a feasible research framework.

Explore topics