Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Buddhist Thought
John Spackman
Philosophy Compass October 1, 2012 DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00506.x (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Buddhism Philosophy of mind |
| Citations | 5 |
| Key points | Argues that existing models for integrating Buddhist thought into philosophy of mind face significant challenges, and proposes a model derived from Nāgārjuna as a potentially more viable alternative. |
Abstract
Abstract Recent years have seen a growing interest in Buddhist thought as a potential source of alternative conceptions of the nature of the mind and the relation between the mental and the physical. This article considers and assesses three different models of what contemporary philosophy of mind can learn from Buddhist thought. One model, advocated by Alan Wallace, holds that we can learn from Buddhist meditation that both individual consciousness and the physical world itself emerge from a deeper, “primordial” consciousness. A second model, supported by Owen Flanagan, maintains that we should accept from Buddhist thought only what is compatible with physicalism, and thus draws from Buddhism only insights into moral psychology and spirituality. Evan Thompson has developed a third, phenomenological approach, which derives from Buddhism a non‐dualistic account of the relation between the mental and the physical, dissolving the “explanatory gap” between them. I suggest that all of these models face significant challenges, and propose a different model derived from the Buddhist philosopher Nāgārjuna, which shows the potential to resolve some of the challenges facing contemporary theories of consciousness.
Comparable studies
Other theoretical and historical papers on buddhism, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mental balance and well-being: Building bridges between Buddhism and Western psychology. | 2006 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience | 1995 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Buddhist and Psychological Perspectives on Emotions and Well-Being | 2005 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Too Early to Tell: The Potential Impact and Challenges—Ethical and Otherwise—Inherent in the Mainstreaming of Dharma in an Increasingly Dystopian World | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| From self to nonself: The Nonself Theory | 2016 | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- The Buddhist Turn in Contemporary Philosophy of Mind Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy January 22, 2022
- Can AI Facilitate Genuine Nondualist Understanding? The Trans-Discursive Boundary of Technological Mediation Topoi February 12, 2026
- Exploring the mind-brain relationship to advance mental health research and practice Current Psychology December 1, 2025
Cites 4
- Phenomenal Concepts and the Explanatory Gap Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge 2007
- Phenomenal Concepts and the Materialist Constraint Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge 2007
- Phenomenal Concepts Philosophy Compass March 28, 2011
- The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience 1991