Consciousness and topologically structured phenomenal spaces.
Consciousness and Cognition February 26, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.02.002 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 43 |
| Key points | Proposes that the unity of consciousness can be modeled using mathematical relations of phenomenal space, and that consciousness should be understood as a series of transitions between structured layers of experience rather than a single brain-to-mind transition. |
Abstract
There are strong reasons to believe that our conscious inner life is structured, suggested both by introspection as well as scientific psychology. One of the most salient structural characteristics of conscious experiences is known as unity of consciousness. In this contribution, we wish to demonstrate how features of experience that pertain to the unity of consciousness could be made precise in terms of mathematical relations that hold between phenomenal objects. Based on phenomenological considerations, we first outline three such features. These are (i) environmental embedding, (ii) the mutual constraint between local and global representations, and (iii) a top-down process of object formation in consciousness. We then introduce a formal model based on the notion of phenomenal space, defined in terms of a set of quasi-elementary and extended entities. We describe the structure of phenomenal space by appealing to mereological and topological concepts, and we outline a projector-based calculus to account for the idea that the structure of phenomenal space is ultimately dynamical. Using the above concepts, one could approach the mind-matter problem by relating environmentally embedded agents to topologically well-defined objects that result from decompositions of phenomenal space. We conclude our discussion by putting it into the context of some recent conceptual questions that appear in cognitive science and consciousness studies. We opt for the possibility to regard the phenomenon of consciousness not in terms of a singular transition that happens between "brain" and "mind" but rather in terms of a series of transitions between structured layers of experience.
Citations in the library
Cited by 24
- Explanatory profiles of models of consciousness - towards a systematic classification. Neuroscience of Consciousness August 27, 2021
- Mathematical Models of Consciousness. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) May 30, 2020
- A Compositional Model of Consciousness Based on Consciousness-Only. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) March 5, 2021
- We need to explain subjective experience, but its explanation may not be mechanistic Neuroscience of Consciousness August 29, 2022
- Reasoning about conscious experience with axiomatic and graphical mathematics. Consciousness and Cognition October 1, 2021
and 19 more in the library
Cites 14
- On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 1995
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- Consciousness as Integrated Information: a Provisional Manifesto Biological Bulletin December 1, 2008
- The neural correlates of consciousness: New experimental approaches needed? Consciousness and Cognition April 5, 2009
- Phenomenology and Connectionism Frontiers in Psychology 2011
and 9 more in the library