Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Consciousness: The Point of View of Process Philosophy and Genetic Structuralism

F. Riffert

Balkan Journal of Philosophy October 16, 2019 DOI: 10.5840/bjp201911211 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Whitehead's process philosophy offers a promising basis for solving the hard problem of consciousness by showing how the concept of consciousness is anchored in his metaphysical theory. Comparing Whitehead's speculative account with Piaget's empirical research results reveals that their positions on consciousness overlap widely, providing indirect empirical support for Whitehead's philosophy. At the two points where they deviate, Whitehead holds the more plausible position. This investigation confirms William Seager's suggestion that more attention should be drawn to Whitehead's process philosophy when addressing both the hard and weak problems of consciousness. Two topics discussed from Whitehead's perspective are learning and consciousness, and artificial consciousness.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Philosophy
Key finding Argues that Whitehead's process philosophy and Piaget's empirical findings on consciousness largely overlap, with Whitehead's position appearing more plausible at points of divergence, thus indirectly supporting Whitehead's approach to consciousness.

Abstract

First a sketch of the current state of the debate of the phenomenon of consciousness is provided; based on it David Chalmer’s distinction between the weak and the hard problem of consciousness will be introduced. It will be indicated that Whitehead’s process philosophy is able to offer a promising basis for solving the hard problem by showing how the concept of consciousness is anchored in his metaphysical theory. In the remaining parts of the paper the so-called weak problem of consciousness will be addressed in more detail by comparing Whitehead’s speculative account with Piaget’s empirical research results concerning the phenomenon of consciousness. By showing that Whitehead’s and Piaget’s positions on consciousness overlap widely a kind of indirect empirical support of Whitehead’s philosophical position will be achieved. At those points where the two positions deviate – that is in only two points – there are indications that Whitehead holds the more plausible position. So this investigation confirms William Seager’s suggestion that more attention should be drawn to Whitehead’s process philosophy when trying to solve the hard, as well as the weak problem of consciousness. In order to substantiate this claim two topics are discussed from the point of view of Whitehead’s position of consciousness: (a) learning and consciousness and (b) artificial consciousness.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment