The Essential Tension in Phenomenal Consciousness
Philosophical Papers January 2, 2020 DOI: 10.1080/05568641.2019.1605844 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Consciousness Sort Content measure theory Simple philosophy Epistemology Redundancy engineering Character mathematics Order exchange Cognitive science Cognitive psychology |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key points | Argues that the standard view of phenomenal consciousness, which combines qualitative and subjective character, leads to regress and redundancy problems, and proposes that subjective awareness is a distinctive factor irreducible to phenomenal content. |
Abstract
The contemporary standard view of phenomenal consciousness (PC)—shared by reductionists and non-reductionists alike—takes it to be a simple, ‘low-level’, ‘pre-reflective’ feature of mental states, yet at the same time attributes to it both a qualitative and a subjective character (or a phenomenal content and an aspect of subjective awareness). I argue that these two allegedly constitutive elements of PC do not go together as harmoniously as is usually assumed. The standard view introduces a complexity into the notion of PC which gives rise to problems of the sort traditionally associated with higher-order views (i.e., regress and redundancy problems). Finding the tension more or less inescapable, and rejecting a simplistic view like Dainton’s, which dispenses altogether with subjective awareness—and arguing that there is a special problem with accounting for the particularity of conscious states—I explore some speculative suggestions as to how subjective awareness could be understood as a distinctive factor that cannot be assimilated to phenomenal content, while maintaining that the two elements are intimately related.