Active inference, computational phenomenology, and advanced meditation: Toward the formalization of the experience of meditation.

Hagar Tal; Malcolm Wright; Shawn Prest; Lars Sandved-Smith; Matthew D. Sacchet

doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106539

Active inference, computational phenomenology, and advanced meditation: Toward the formalization of the experience of meditation.

Hagar Tal, Malcolm Wright, Shawn Prest, Lars Sandved-Smith, Matthew D. Sacchet

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews March 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106539 (opens in new tab)

Read Full Text

Relevant Not relevant

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract

Characteristics	Review Peer reviewed
Topics	Meditation Philosophy of mind
Keywords	Aif Advanced meditation Attention Computational phenomenology Precision weighting
Citations	2
Key findings	Precision weighting is identified as a common mechanism across computational models that accounts for experiential shifts in advanced meditation, though models differ in whether they emphasize top-down attentional modulation or layer-specific re-weighting.

Abstract

Computational phenomenology has emerged as a powerful framework for investigating advanced meditation states and stages, and meditative development and endpoints. Various models have been proposed to mechanistically explain the diverse experiences associated with these practices, including enhanced well-being, shifts in attentional control, the loosening or 'defabrication' of perceptual constructions, as well as minimal phenomenal experiences and transformative meditative endpoints such as cessations. However, these models have developed in disparate directions, and an integrative understanding of the underlying mechanisms remains elusive. This review examines how computational models attempt to account for the phenomenology of advanced meditation, with a particular focus on Active Inference as a modeling framework. We identify precision weighting, the confidence attributed to different model parameters, as a common mechanism across models, shaping experiential shifts. Furthermore, we observe a marked difference between early models, which emphasize top-down attentional modulation toward interoception or specific focus objects, and later models which center on layer-specific precision re-weighting within the meditator's hierarchical generative model and target more specific phenomenology. These differences arise from variations in the models' aims, scope, and definitions of contemplative practice. Despite increased interest in minimal phenomenal experience, related states and formal endpoints such as nonduality and cessations remain largely unaddressed. Few models tackle reported increases in cognitive flexibility and learning from meditation, while fundamental mechanisms behind informal practice and affective processes, and processes underlying compassion traditions, remain underexplored. Addressing these gaps is crucial for refining computational models of advanced meditation and informing our understanding of its cognitive, affective, and experiential effects.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Study	Year	Design
Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics	2008	Review article
Phenomenology, Structure, and Dynamic of Psychedelic States	2016	Review
Classic Hallucinogens and Mystical Experiences: Phenomenology and Neural Correlates.	2018	Review
The lived experience of psychosis: a bottom-up review co-written by experts by experience and academics. Individuals with lived experience of psychosis, family members, and carers	2022	Co-written bottom-up review
From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology: Francisco Varela's exploration of the biophysics of being.	2003	Review

Citations in the library

Cited by 4

Cites 68

and 63 more in the library