Modeling Retention Behavior on Analysis of Hallucinogenic Mushrooms Using Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography
Norbert Rácz, Júlia Nagy, Wen Jiang, Tibor Veress
Journal of Chromatographic Science November 15, 2018 DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmy104 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Comparative study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Extract of a truffle-like fungus containing psilocin, psilocybin, and baeocystin |
| Keywords | Hydrophilic interaction chromatography Acetonitrile Analytical chemistry journal High-performance liquid chromatography |
| Citations | 12 |
| Key points | All three HILIC columns separated the hallucinogenic alkaloids from each other and matrix components, with the quadratic modeling approach best predicting retention times. |
Abstract
The goal of this work was to investigate and compare the selectivity of three different hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) charge modulated amide columns, iHILIC®-Fusion, iHILIC®-Fusion(+) and iHILIC®-Fusion(P), for analysis of compounds in hallucinogen mushrooms. An extract of a truffle-like fungus containing psilocin, psilocybin and baeocystin was chosen as test material. Three different modeling methods were applied to describe the retention times of constituents in isocratic separation mode as a function of mobile phase composition, pH and temperature. Two models using DryLab® 2010 assumed quadratic and exponential relationship between the retention time and solvent fraction of aqueous component of the mobile phase, respectively. These models also illustrate the van't Hoff like equation to describe the temperature-dependence of the retention factor and the theory of Snyder et al. to estimate the retention factor as a function of pH of the aqueous mobile phase component. The third model using STATISTICA® multivariate data analysis in a predefined experimental space was able to predict the retention times. All HILIC columns in this comparison were proved to be suitable for separation of the two hallucinogenic alkaloids from each other and from the matrix components. Majority of compounds were separated with satisfactory resolutions required by the comparative analysis despite some of them were not fully baseline separated. It was found the best modeling was obtained by using the quadratic approach to predict chromatograms for predefined chromatographic conditions (volumetric ratio of acetonitrile to buffer, pH of the buffer and temperature), while the exponential model proved to be the worst for prediction. The modeling with multivariate data analysis fell between the other two methods.
Citations in the library
Cited by 5
- Diversity, biology, and history of psilocybin-containing fungi: Suggestions for research and technological development. Fungal biology April 1, 2022
- Combining FTIR-ATR and OPLS-DA methods for magic mushrooms discrimination Forensic Chemistry April 8, 2022
- Systematic Error for Extraction of Controlled Substances from Plant/Fungal Materials. Journal of Chromatographic Science October 26, 2020
- Direct Quantitation of Psilocybin and Psilocin by 1H and 31P qNMR in Wild Psilocybe from Greece ACS Omega October 9, 2026
- Unlocking the power of tryptamine alkaloids in Psilocybe fungi: chemistry, mental health potential and legal challenges Mycological Progress December 8, 2025
Cites 3
- Determination of psilocybin in hallucinogenic mushrooms by reversed-phase liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection Talanta January 7, 2005
- Determination of psilocin and psilocybin using flow injection analysis with acidic potassium permanganate and tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) chemiluminescence detection respectively Talanta February 17, 2005
- HPLC Analysis of Hallucinogenic Mushroom Alkaloids (Psilocin and Psilocybin) Applying Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography (HILIC) Journal of Forensic Research 2016