Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Steven S. Gouveia

2 papers in the library · 12 citations · publishing 2024-2026

Papers

Does artificial intelligence exhibit basic fundamental subjectivity? A neurophilosophical argument

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences February 26, 2024 Georg Northoff, Steven S. Gouveia 12 citations

Artificial intelligence does not exhibit basic subjectivity, the foundational feature required for consciousness or self. Subjectivity, defined by perspectiveness and mineness of experience, ontologically traces to a point of view. Adopting a non-reductive neurophilosophical approach, the point of view comprises a neuroecological layer mediated by timescales of world and brain, and a higher-order mental layer. Empirical data on the sense of self support this layered view. Current AI lacks these timescales and a point of view with perspectiveness and mineness. Thus, models like ChatGPT and similar technologies do not possess basic subjectivity, making consciousness or self impossible in their current state.

Philosophy and Neuroscience: Tango or Solo Dancing?

Principia an international journal of epistemology March 25, 2026 Steven S. Gouveia, Ângela Leite

The paper examines four ways philosophy and neuroscience can relate when studying consciousness and the brain. The Isolationist Approach keeps them separate, like solo dancing. The Reductionist Approach reduces philosophy to neuroscience. The Neurophenomenological Approach rejects reduction but keeps them interacting, like a tango, emphasizing an embodied study of consciousness. The Non-Reductive Neurophilosophical Approach uses both disciplines for their epistemic value. Survey data from neurophilosophy experts show a preference for approaches that interconnect the two fields, though the exact type of interconnection varies.