Skip to content

Sentient Forests as Nature, as Myth or as a More Real Shamanic Nature: The Ontological Re-turn

Xabier Renteria-Uriarte, Roslyn M. Frank

Ethnos February 26, 2026 DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2026.2626392 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Shamanism
Key points Argues that inward perceptual empiricism, largely overlooked in debates about the ontological turn, shows shamanic 'sentient forests' to be 'more real' than the objective forest, which the author contends is not 'out there' but an emerging level of the former. Proposes an 'ontological re-turn' that considers ethnographic sources together with inner perceptual levels and attends more closely to terms like 'perception' and 'ontology'.

Abstract

Despite the diversity of debates about the ontological turn, the inward perceptual empiricism that constitutes the main source of non-Western epistemologies – both oral and written – has not yet been fully considered. The helpful case here will be that of the ‘sentient forest’, which has emerged as a guiding belief in Western countries, with forests and plants increasingly being regarded as sentient, conscious, intelligent, and/or communicative, but present in most cultures through mythical representations and shamanic perceptions. Contrary to the usual ‘politically correct’ ontological interpretations and their main underlying assumption, inward empiricism shows that shamanic forests are ‘more real’ than the objective forest, and that the latter are not actually ‘out there’ but rather an emerging level of the former. An ontological re-turn is proposed that considers ethnographic sources necessarily together with the inner perceptual levels that give rise to ‘natures-ontologies-cultures’, with more attention to terms like ‘perception’ and ‘ontology’.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on shamanism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics