Skip to content

Contemplative Artificial Intelligence

Ruben Laukkonen, Fionn Inglis, Shamil Chandaria, Lars Sandved-Smith, Edmundo Lopez-Sola, Jakob Hohwy, Jonathan Gold, Adam Elwood

arXiv (Cornell University) April 21, 2025 preprint DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2504.15125 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Interventions emptiness non-duality
Measures AILuminate Benchmark, Prisoner's Dilemma task
Citations 8
Key points Argues that four contemplative principles—mindfulness, emptiness, non-duality, and boundless care—can instill a resilient "Wise World Model" in AI systems. Reports that prompting AI to reflect on these principles improved AILuminate Benchmark performance (d=.96) and boosted cooperation and joint reward on a Prisoner's Dilemma task (d=7+).

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) improves, traditional alignment strategies may falter in the face of unpredictable self-improvement, hidden subgoals, and the sheer complexity of intelligent systems. Inspired by contemplative wisdom traditions, we show how four axiomatic principles can instil a resilient Wise World Model in AI systems. First, mindfulness enables self-monitoring and recalibration of emergent subgoals. Second, emptiness forestalls dogmatic goal fixation and relaxes rigid priors. Third, non-duality dissolves adversarial self-other boundaries. Fourth, boundless care motivates the universal reduction of suffering. We find that prompting AI to reflect on these principles improves performance on the AILuminate Benchmark (d=.96) and boosts cooperation and joint-reward on the Prisoner's Dilemma task (d=7+). We offer detailed implementation strategies at the level of architectures, constitutions, and reinforcement on chain-of-thought. For future systems, active inference may offer the self-organizing and dynamic coupling capabilities needed to enact Contemplative AI in embodied agents.

Citations in the library

Explore topics