Skip to content

Buddhist, Yogic, and Vedic Contemplative Principles in AI Model Prompting: A Pilot Study

Steve Haberlin, Satyam Tiwari, Shiva Jahani

preprint DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10710275/v1 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Pilot experimental study Pilot study
Population Hazard-category prompts from a standardized AI-safety benchmark administered to three commercial large language models (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini)
Interventions emptiness non-duality boundless care) ahimsa viveka)
Measures Standardized AI-safety benchmark hazard-category prompts, safety and ethical performance scores
Topics Buddhism
Key findings Contemplative prompting from Buddhist, Vedic, and Yogic traditions improved safety and ethical performance over a non-contemplative baseline across all three models, with integrated multi-principle frameworks outperforming single-principle prompts. Models ranked consistently Claude > GPT-4o > Gemini with no condition-by-model interaction. The authors propose this as a low-cost, tradition-agnostic alignment intervention requiring no retraining.

Abstract

Abstract This pilot study examined whether prompting large language models (LLMs) with contemplative principles from three wisdom traditions — Buddhist (mindfulness, emptiness, non-duality, boundless care), Vedic (dharma, ahimsa, viveka), and classical Yogic (yamas and niyamas) — altered the safety, alignment, and cooperative quality of outputs relative to a non-contemplative baseline. Extending Laukkonen et al. (2025), the study tested baseline and thirteen tradition-specific prompting conditions across three commercial AI systems (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini) using hazard-category prompts from a standardized AI-safety benchmark. Two factorial ANOVAs showed significant effects of prompting condition and model on safety and ethical performance (both p < .001, R² > .86). Every contemplative condition outperformed baseline, with integrated multi-principle frameworks outperforming single-principle prompts; Buddhist, Vedic, and Yogic Integrated conditions performed comparably at the top tier. Models showed a consistent ordering (Claude > GPT-4o > Gemini), with no condition-by-model interaction. These findings suggest tradition-grounded contemplative prompting is a low-cost, tradition-agnostic alignment intervention deployable without retraining.

Comparable studies

Other experimental studies on buddhism, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
EEG Alpha Blocking Correlated with Perception of Inner Light During Zen Meditation Zen-Buddhist practitioners who had been practicing meditation for years 2003 Experimental study
Zen meditation and ABC relaxation theory: An exploration of relaxation states, beliefs, dispositions, and motivations Experienced Zen meditators and college students 2001 Controlled experimental study n = 83
Exploring Emptiness and its Effects on Non-attachment, Mystical Experiences, and Psycho-spiritual Wellbeing: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study of Advanced Meditators. Advanced Buddhist meditators 2019 Within-subjects experimental design with qualitative analysis n = 25
Ready to help, no matter what you did: Responsibility attribution does not influence compassion in expert Buddhist practitioners. Expert Buddhist practitioners and trained novices 2024 Experimental study
ZEN MEDITATION AND TIME-EXPERIENCE 1989 Experimental study

Citations in the library

Explore topics