Skip to content

‘Shamanism’ in Twentieth-Century History

Caroline Humphrey, Urgunge Onon

Oxford University Press eBooks March 28, 1996 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198279419.003.0008 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Historical analysis Peer reviewed
Population Daur people in the 1920s and 1930s
Topics Shamanism
Key points The author observes that despite Daur exposure to modern technology, multilingualism, political autonomy struggles from 1912, and involvement in modern social reorganization, none of this modern context appeared overtly in shamanic discourse, which remained markedly archaic.

Abstract

Abstract By now readers may be wondering about the almost perversely archaic content of the shamanic materials I have presented. Here were people in the 1920s and 1930s of this century, within reliable reportage-range of great revolutions and new ideologies. Cars, planes, radios, and telephones were not totally unheard of. Many people knew several languages. Daurs had taken part in wider regional struggles for autonomy from 1912 onwards, and later their leaders were involved in modern schemes to reorganize society along with the Chinese, Japanese, and Mongolians. Yet absolutely none of this appeared overtly in shamanic discourse.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on shamanism, most cited first.

Explore topics