Skip to content

Effects of psychedelics on subjective and objective sleep outcomes: A systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis

Xin Yang, Shuping Fang, Kejia Hu, Wenqi Lyu, Yilin Liu, Yuan Shi, Lu Tan, Rong Ren, Ye Zhang, Weihong Kuang, Xiangdong Tang

Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology October 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1177/20451253261502573 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,975
Population Adults receiving classic psychedelics, MDMA, or ketamine and reporting sleep outcomes or sleep-related adverse events
Interventions Classic psychedelics MDMA ketamine
Key findings Controlled MDMA studies suggested improved subjective sleep quality in the subacute phase versus controls (Hedges' g = -0.78), and uncontrolled MDMA follow-up showed within-group improvement (g = -0.63). Ketamine did not show a statistically significant within-group improvement in subjective sleep quality (g = -0.45). Evidence for classic psychedelics was insufficient for meta-analysis, and sleep-related adverse events were generally mild and transient.

Abstract

Background: Psychedelics, including classic psychedelics, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and ketamine, are increasingly investigated for psychiatric disorders, but their effects on sleep remain unclear.

Objectives: To systematically evaluate the effects of these interventions on subjective and objective sleep outcomes and summarize sleep-related adverse events.

Design: A systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis was conducted. Subjective and objective sleep outcomes were synthesized using random-effects models with standardized mean differences (Hedges’ g) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analyses were stratified by study design and post-administration assessment phase. Data Sources and

Methods: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 15, 2026. Eligible studies included adults receiving classic psychedelics, MDMA, or ketamine and reporting subjective or objective sleep outcomes or sleep-related adverse events. Objective sleep measures assessed by polysomnography or actigraphy were extracted when available.

Results: Thirty-two reports representing 30 independent studies and 1,975 participants were included. Evidence for classic psychedelics was limited, with insufficient data for meta-analysis. Controlled MDMA studies during the subacute phase suggested improved subjective sleep quality compared with controls (Hedges’ g = -0.78; 95% CI -1.40 to -0.17; I 2 = 14.4%; very low certainty). Uncontrolled MDMA studies during follow-up also showed within-group improvement (Hedges’ g = -0.63; 95% CI -1.13 to -0.14; I 2 = 0%). Ketamine studies did not demonstrate a statistically significant within-group improvement in subjective sleep quality during the subacute phase (Hedges’ g = -0.45; 95% CI -1.04 to 0.14; I 2 = 88.8%). Sleep-related adverse events were generally mild and transient, including insomnia, hypersomnia, and unpleasant dreams.

Conclusion: Psychedelics may have compound-specific and time-dependent effects on sleep. However, the evidence remains preliminary because of small samples, heterogeneous designs, and limited objective and long-term data.

Citations in the library

Explore topics