Skip to content

Cortical responses to consciousness of schematic emotional facial expressions: A high‐resolution EEG study

Claudio Babiloni, Fabrizio Vecchio, Paola Buffo, Maura Buttiglione, Giuseppe Cibelli, Paolo Maria Rossini

Human Brain Mapping October 1, 2010 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20958 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Experimental electroencephalography study Peer reviewed
Sample size 15
Population Normal adults
Measures visual event-related potentials (ERPs), LORETA, reaction time
Topics Philosophy of mind
Key findings Cue faces evoked four ERP components with similar peak latencies whether or not the face was reported seen, but N170 amplitude differed: seen trials showed larger prefrontal, premotor, and posterior parietal N170 sources for sad faces and smaller sources for neutral and happy faces. Reaction times to go stimuli were generally shorter on seen than not-seen trials. The authors suggest conscious and nonconscious processing share a similar temporal evolution, with consciousness inducing early cortical enhancement for sad expressions.

Abstract

Abstract: Is conscious perception of emotional face expression related to enhanced cortical responses? Electroencephalographic data (112 channels) were recorded in 15 normal adults during the presentation of cue stimuli with neutral, happy or sad schematic faces (duration: “threshold time” inducing about 50% of correct recognitions), masking stimuli (2 s), and go stimuli with happy or sad schematic faces (0.5 s). The subjects clicked left (right) mouse button in response to go stimuli with happy (sad) faces. After the response, they said “seen” or “not seen” with reference to previous cue stimulus. Electroencephalographic data formed visual event‐related potentials (ERPs). Cortical sources of ERPs were estimated by LORETA software. Reaction time to go stimuli was generally shorter during “seen” than “not seen” trials, possibly due to covert attention and awareness. The cue stimuli evoked four ERP components (posterior N100, N170, P200, and P300), which had similar peak latency in the “not seen” and “seen” ERPs. Only N170 amplitude showed differences in amplitude in the “seen” versus “not seen” ERPs. Compared to the “not seen” ERPs, the “seen” ones showed prefrontal, premotor, and posterior parietal sources of N170 higher in amplitude with the sad cue stimuli and lower in amplitude with the neutral and happy cue stimuli. These results suggest that nonconscious and conscious processing of schematic emotional facial expressions shares a similar temporal evolution of cortical activity, and conscious processing induces an early enhancement of bilateral cortical activity for the schematic sad facial expressions (N170). Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Citations in the library

Explore topics