Skip to content

Neuroscience and everyday life: Facing the translation problem.

Jolien C. Francken, Marc Slors

Brain and Cognition February 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.09.004 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Cognitive ontology Concepts Constructs Eliminativism Folk psychology Taxonomy
Key points Argues that a 'translation problem' obstructs moving from neuroscience to common-sense use because neuroscientific terminology and common-sense concepts are hard to square, cognitive concepts are used unsystematically, and they map only indirectly and divergently onto brain activity. Proposes three strategies: new 'folk-neuroscience' concepts, scientific refinement and validation of existing concepts, and revision of application criteria for concepts like responsibility and consciousness.

Abstract

To enable the impact of neuroscientific insights on our daily lives, careful translation of research findings is required. However, neuroscientific terminology and common-sense concepts are often hard to square. For example, when neuroscientists study lying to allow the use of brain scans for lie-detection purposes, the concept of lying in the scientific case differs considerably from the concept in court. Furthermore, lying and other cognitive concepts are used unsystematically and have an indirect and divergent mapping onto brain activity. Therefore, scientific findings cannot inform our practical concerns in a straightforward way. How then can neuroscience ultimately help determine if a defendant is legally responsible, or help someone understand their addiction better? Since the above-mentioned problems provide serious obstacles to move from science to common-sense, we call this the 'translation problem'. Here, we describe three promising approaches for neuroscience to face this translation problem. First, neuroscience could propose new 'folk-neuroscience' concepts, beyond the traditional folk-psychological array, which might inform and alter our phenomenology. Second, neuroscience can modify our current array of common-sense concepts by refining and validating scientific concepts. Third, neuroscience can change our views on the application criteria of concepts such as responsibility and consciousness. We believe that these strategies to deal with the translation problem should guide the practice of neuroscientific research to be able to contribute to our day-to-day life more effectively.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics