Skip to content

Dharmakı¯rti

Mark Siderits

Routledge eBooks October 4, 2016 DOI: 10.4324/9781315678023-10 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism
Key points Argues that Dharmakīrti's rejection of physicalism is motivated by soteriological concerns about rebirth, and that his own argument against physicalism is unpromising. Proposes examining Dharmakīrti's claim that consciousness is necessarily reflexive as a potentially better basis for questioning reductive physicalism.

Abstract

The problem of consciousness investigated in this volume is a problem primarily for physicalists. Dharmakı¯rti, like all other Indian Buddhist philosophers, rejects physicalism. 1 The motivation behind the panBuddhist consensus on physicalism is soteriological in nature: if a sentient being is no more than a body and a brain, then rebirth would seem to be ruled out, and at death everyone e ortlessly attains the professed Buddhist goal of cessation of rebirth. While this might be his motive for rejecting physicalism, Dharmakı¯rti nevertheless must supply an argument in response to the physicalist threat to his religious practice. We will examine the argument he provides. 2 But since it turns out to be unpromising, we will also examine his claim that consciousness is necessarily refl exive, to see if this might be used to construct a better reason to question a reductive physicalist account of sentience.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on buddhism, most cited first.

Explore topics