Skip to content

Associations between classic psychedelics and opioid use disorder in a nationally-representative U.S. adult sample

Grant Jones, Jocelyn A. Ricard, Joshua Lipson, Matthew K. Nock

Scientific Reports April 7, 2022 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08085-4 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional analysis of survey data Longitudinal Peer reviewed
Sample size 214,505
Population U.S. respondents to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2015–2019)
Topics Addiction Psilocybin
Keywords Odds ratio Logistic regression Demography
Citations 56
Key findings Lifetime psilocybin use was associated with lowered odds of opioid use disorder (aOR: 0.70; 95% CI [0.60, 0.83]), while other classic psychedelics were not.

Abstract

Abstract Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a major source of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. and there is a pressing need to identify additional treatments for the disorder. Classic psychedelics (psilocybin, peyote, mescaline, LSD) have been linked to the alleviation of various substance use disorders and may hold promise as potential treatments for OUD. The aim of this study was to assess whether the aforementioned classic psychedelic substances conferred lowered odds of OUD. Furthermore, this study aimed to replicate and extend findings from Pisano et al. (2017) who found classic psychedelic use to be linked to lowered odds of OUD in a nationally representative sample. We used recent data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2015–2019) ( N = 214,505) and multivariable logistic regression to test whether lifetime use (yes/no) of classic psychedelics was associated with lowered odds of OUD. Lifetime psilocybin use was associated with lowered odds of OUD (aOR: 0.70; 95% CI [0.60, 0.83]). No other substances, including other classic psychedelics, were associated with lowered odds of OUD. Additionally, sensitivity analyses revealed psilocybin use to be associated with lowered odds of seven of the 11 DSM-IV criteria for OUD (aOR range: 0.66–0.83). Future clinical trials and longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether these associations are causal.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on psilocybin for addiction, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Persisting Reductions in Cannabis, Opioid, and Stimulant Misuse After Naturalistic Psychedelic Use: An Online Survey Online survey respondents 2020 Cross-sectional survey
User perceptions of the benefits and harms of hallucinogenic drug use: A web-based questionnaire study Users of hallucinogenic drugs who completed a web-based questionnaire 2010 Cross-sectional survey n = 600
Increased use of illicit drugs in a Dutch cluster headache population People with cluster headache in the Netherlands 2018 Cross-sectional study n = 756
Epidemiology of classic psychedelic substances: results from a Norwegian internet convenience sample Norwegian adults who have had a memorable experience after taking a classic psychedelic... 2023 Cross-sectional survey n = 770
The association between naturalistic use of psychedelics and co-occurring substance use disorders US adults from the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2023 Cross-sectional study n = 56,276

Explore topics

By condition and practice