Realism, Idealism, and the Paradox of Subjectivity in Transcendental Phenomenology
Tyeson Davies-Barton
European Journal of Philosophy October 22, 2026 DOI: 10.1111/ejop.70130 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Philosophy of mind |
| Key points | Argues that the idealist version of transcendental phenomenology, on its main accounts of the subject, generates at least one form of Husserl's "paradox of human subjectivity," whereas the realist version can explain how one and the same subject is both transcendental and empirical without generating either paradox, providing prima facie reason to favor the realist version for those who accept the shared commitments. |
Abstract
Abstract This article examines the significance of what Edmund Husserl calls “the paradox of human subjectivity” for the metaphysical realism‐idealism debate in transcendental phenomenology. I distinguish two plausible interpretations of the paradox that are relevant to this debate. I term the first a vicious circle of mutual dependence: the world is characterized as being ontologically dependent on one causally dependent part of the world. I term the second a paradox of bodily self‐constitution: the transcendental subject is defined in such a way that it would be impossible for it to constitute itself as an empirical subject, and yet, in order to constitute the world, it must undergo such a process of self‐objectification. I focus on one prominent version of phenomenology from each side of the realism‐idealism debate, treating them as counterparts insofar as they share three core commitments. I argue that while the main accounts of the subject available to this idealist version generate at least one such paradox, the realist version can explain how one and the same subject is both transcendental and empirical without generating either paradox. My argument therefore provides a substantial prima facie reason to favour this realist version of phenomenology over its idealist counterpart for those who accept their shared commitments and take transcendental phenomenology to have metaphysical implications for the realism‐idealism debate.
Comparable studies
Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. | 2003 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| From dopamine to salience to psychosis--linking biology, pharmacology and phenomenology of psychosis. | 2005 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| How do the brain's time and space mediate consciousness and its different dimensions? Temporo-spatial theory of consciousness (TTC). | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in OCD: an enactive affordance-based model. | 2013 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Looking for the Self: Phenomenology, Neurophysiology and Philosophical Significance of Drug-induced Ego Dissolution | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper |