Debate: Innovations in mindfulness for young people need to take more account of their unique needs if they are to live up to their potential.
Leigh Burrows
Child and Adolescent Mental Health October 2, 2022 DOI: 10.1111/camh.12601 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Commentary Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Intervention | Mindfulness training |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Keywords | Humans Qualitative research Students Adolescent Adolescence Child development Counselling Behaviour therapy |
| Key points | Argues that claims for mindfulness benefits in children and young people are premature: the MYRIAD project, involving more than 28,000 young people, found a brief mindfulness intervention for early teens had no impact on preventing mental health problems or promoting well-being, with many participants disengaged, and researchers raised concern about potentially harmful effects. The author calls for nuanced qualitative research on young people's subjective experience and tailored delivery. |
Abstract
While the current popularity of mindfulness suggests that it will foster various social-emotional, personal, and academic benefits, current claims for the benefits of mindfulness for children and young people is premature according to Butterfield, Roberts, Feltis, and Kocovski (2020) who argue that 'despite the media hype and the increase in peer-reviewed publications the evidence base for mindfulness programs for children is not robust' (p. 194). A recent report from a large scale mindfulness project conducted by a number of highly experienced mindfulness researchers and involving more than 28,000 young people outlines that: 'For the most part the young people did not engage with the mindfulness training' and 'our results suggested mindfulness training might work for some children and not for others, and under some conditions, but not others' (https://myriadproject.org/what-we-did/). The MYRIAD project carefully tested the effects of a brief mindfulness intervention for early teens and found it to have no impact on preventing mental health problems or promoting well-being. Researchers in this project found that since the young participants were generally not particularly engaged overall in mindfulness a more engaging accessible and effective format and teaching format and mode of delivery may have been needed. Myriad researchers included students' feedback comments: 'didn't find it useful'; found it 'boring'; had 'no choice'; 'couldn't do it; didn't do it'. More concerning is their finding of potentially harmful effects leading the researchers to state that: future research and innovations should carefully consider the unique needs and developmental stage of young people (Montero-Marin et al., 2022, p. 123). I argue in this short 'debate' piece that there is a pressing need for more nuanced, broad ranging and creative qualitative research that can help us understand young people's rich subjective experience of mindfulness, why they might not engage in mindfulness and how to better tailor it for their individual needs and contexts.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Combining mindfulness and cognitive training in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: study protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial (the NeuroMind study). Frontiers in Psychology 2024
- You Can Lead an Adolescent to Mindfulness, but You Can’t Make Them Mindful Mindfulness July 1, 2024
- Do Not Keep Calm and Carry on: School-Based Mindfulness Programmes Should Test Making Mindfulness Practice Available in the School Day Mindfulness December 1, 2023
Cites 2
- Do Adolescents Like School-Based Mindfulness Training? Predictors of Mindfulness Practice and Responsiveness in the MYRIAD Trial Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry May 1, 2023
- Mindfulness with children and adolescents: effective clinical application. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry July 2008