Skip to content

The Four Temporal Masteries of Phenomena: Emergence, Abiding, Dissolution, and Absence

David (daoud) Matta

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) September 6, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22488382 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Key points Argues that experience is better understood through a fourfold temporal framework — emergence, abiding, dissolution, and absence — in which dynamic phases fail through errors of rate and stable phases through errors of modality, each requiring a distinct capacity (receptivity, non-attachment, relinquishment, openness to non-presence). Proposes treating absence as a phase in its own right, with compulsive substitution as its characteristic failure, and introduces 'temporal equanimity' as a construct with a candidate measurement structure.

Abstract

Experience is ordinarily analysed in terms of what appears in consciousness — thoughts, emotions, relationships, roles, identities — and its hedonic tone. Little attention is given to the temporal phase a phenomenon occupies, or to the fact that each phase elicits a distinctive psychological vulnerability. This paper proposes a fourfold phenomenological framework: emergence, abiding, dissolution, and absence. Emergence is the dynamic movement of a phenomenon into experiential presence; abiding is its relative stabilisation; dissolution is its movement out of presence; absence is the relatively stable condition in which it is no longer present. The phases alternate between dynamic and stable modes, and this alternation is explanatory rather than decorative: dynamic phases fail through errors of rate, in which the tempo of consciousness diverges from that of the phenomenon, while stable phases fail through errors of modality, in which a contingent condition is misread as necessary. Each phase therefore calls for a distinct capacity: receptivity, non-attachment, relinquishment, and openness to non-presence. Several literatures already isolate the aftermath of an ending within their own domains, but they do so non-transferably and treat it as a transition toward a successor state. The paper's contribution is to treat absence as a phase in its own right across grains from seconds to decades, to identify compulsive substitution rather than grief as its characteristic failure, and to propose temporal equanimity — stability across the temporal status of objects, as distinct from stability across their hedonic valence — as a construct with a candidate measurement structure.

Explore topics