Skip to content

Spirituality and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: content comparison of questionnaires measuring mindfulness based on the International Classification of Functioning.

Martin Offenbächer, Sebastian Sauer, Robin Hieblinger, David J. Hufford, Harald Walach, Niko Kohls

Disability and Rehabilitation April 27, 2011 DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2011.573902 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Population 10 mindfulness questionnaires published in peer-reviewed journals and listed in Pubmed or PsycInfo
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Disability evaluation Health status indicators Spirituality Psychometrics Surveys and questionnaires
Key findings Of 341 concepts from 10 mindfulness questionnaires, 94% could be linked to 37 ICF categories, with 171 (50.1%) mapping to Body Function, 74 (21.7%) to Activity and Participation, and none to Environmental Factors; 28.2% of linked concepts belonged to Personal factors not yet classified in the ICF. The authors argue that the ICF is a useful external reference for comparing mindfulness questionnaires and that the concepts suggest potentially useful factors for ICF classification.

Abstract

Purpose: To identify and compare the concepts contained in questionnaires measuring mindfulness using the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) as external reference.

Method: Questionnaires which are published in peer-reviewed journals and listed in Pubmed or PsycInfo were included. The questionnaires were analysed and, using a content-analytical approach, the respective items were categorised and linked to the ICF.

Results: Ten questionnaires were included. Ninety-four per cent (N = 341) of the concepts could be linked to 37 different ICF categories. One hundred and seventy-one (50.1%) concepts were linked to ICF categories of the component Body Function, 74 (21.7%) to categories of the component Activity and Participation and none to categories of the component Environmental Factors. In total, 28.2% of the linked concepts belonged to Personal factors, which are not yet classified in the ICF. The questionnaires exhibited considerable differences regarding content density (i.e. the average number of concepts per item) and content diversity (i.e. the number of ICF categories per concept).

Conclusions: The ICF provides an useful external reference to identify and compare the concepts contained in mindfulness questionnaires. Also, mindfulness questionnaire concepts suggest potentially useful factors for classification within the ICF.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics