Skip to content

Scrutinizing the Components of Mindfulness: Insights from Current, Past, and Non-meditators

Dandan Pang, Willibald Ruch

Mindfulness July 5, 2018 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-018-0990-4 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional survey with confirmatory factor analysis and hierarchical factor analysis Peer reviewed
Sample size 2,247
Population German-speaking volunteers with different levels of meditation experience (current meditators, past meditators, and non-meditators)
Measures Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)
Topics Meditation
Citations 32
Key findings The authors report that the FFMQ's factor structure varies with meditation experience, especially for the observing facet, which loaded on an overall mindfulness construct differently across current meditators, past meditators, and non-meditators. Past meditators who stopped practicing showed lower awareness, non-judging, and non-reacting but preserved observing and describing, and past meditators with intensive training scored higher on all five facets than those who practiced less.

Abstract

The factor structure of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) seems to vary across samples depending on whether meditators or non-meditators are studied and whether a sample is analyzed before or after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. The current study illustrates the inconsistencies typically found (e.g., whether all five facets can load on an overall construct of mindfulness), as well as provides and tests alternative explanations in three samples with different levels of meditation experience (i.e., current meditators, past meditators, and non-meditators). Altogether, 2247 German-speaking volunteers completed the FFMQ and reported their meditation experiences online. Results showed that the scaling of three facets of the FFMQ (i.e., observing, describing, and non-judging) were constrained in all samples. The past meditators revealed unique features in terms of their mindfulness level: (1) stopping practicing meditation reduced their levels of mindfulness in facets of awareness, non-judging, and non-reacting, yet observing and describing seemed to remain and (2) those past meditators with intensive trainings scored higher in all five facets than those past meditators who practiced less. The CFA yielded a good fit in all three samples. A hierarchical factor analysis showed how the factors unfolded from level to level and demonstrated that in particular the observing facet loaded on the overall construct of mindfulness differently across the three samples. The empirical results confirmed the alternative interpretations on why the discrepancy regarding the loading of the “observing” facet on an overall mindfulness construct occurs, but future studies might think of investigating each hypothesis specifically.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics