Skip to content

Neural correlates of stimulus reportability.

Oliver J Hulme, Karl Friston, Semir Zeki

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience August 1, 2009 DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21119 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational fMRI study Peer reviewed
Population Human subjects performing a partial report object detection task
Keywords Humans Oxygen Magnetic resonance imaging Brain mapping Reproducibility of results Photic stimulation Consciousness Pattern recognition, visual Decision making Attention Reaction time Psychophysics Time factors Image processing, computer-assisted Female Young adult
Key findings Stimulus reportability decomposes into distinct neural components: early visual cortex responses correlate with stimulus processing but not decision or report, parietal/temporal regions correlate with decisions but not stimulus presence, and motor regions correlate with report. The authors argue this framework allows study of reportability without presupposing a link between reportability and consciousness.

Abstract

Most experiments on the "neural correlates of consciousness" employ stimulus reportability as an operational definition of what is consciously perceived. The interpretation of such experiments therefore depends critically on understanding the neural basis of stimulus reportability. Using a high volume of fMRI data, we investigated the neural correlates of stimulus reportability using a partial report object detection paradigm. Subjects were presented with a random array of circularly arranged disc-stimuli and were cued, after variable delays (following stimulus offset), to report the presence or absence of a disc at the cued location, using variable motor actions. By uncoupling stimulus processing, decision, and motor response, we were able to use signal detection theory to deconstruct the neural basis of stimulus reportability. We show that retinotopically specific responses in the early visual cortex correlate with stimulus processing but not decision or report; a network of parietal/temporal regions correlates with decisions but not stimulus presence, whereas classical motor regions correlate with report. These findings provide a basic framework for understanding the neural basis of stimulus reportability without the theoretical burden of presupposing a relationship between reportability and consciousness.

Citations in the library

Explore topics