Frontal–striatal–thalamic circuit dysfunction and inferential processing between internal representations and external events across the psychosis spectrum
Naoyuki Katagiri, Hiromi Tagata, Takashi Uchino, Yu Arai, Karin Hayashi, Junichi Saito, Kouhei Kamiya, Masaaki Hori, Masafumi Mizuno, Takahiro Nemoto
Frontiers in Psychiatry September 29, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1930683 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Longitudinal Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that imbalance in the frontal-striatal-thalamic circuit may disrupt inferential processing that minimizes discrepancies between internal models and environmental information, distorting subjective experience and contributing to symptoms in At-Risk Mental States and Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome. Proposes this model is theoretically consistent with prior findings and the authors' longitudinal studies, offering a novel perspective on information-processing alterations across clinical high-risk states for psychosis. |
Abstract
Background: In psychopathology, schizophrenia has been understood as a disorder characterized by disturbances in subjective consciousness. Subjective consciousness and its relationship to interactions between internal representations and external events have been discussed in phenomenology. Recent computational neuroscience conceptualizes the brain as an inferential system that minimizes discrepancies between internal models and latent states inferred from environmental information. From a neurobiological perspective, the frontal–striatal–thalamic circuit may underlie the inferential processing involved in updating internal models based on sensory information derived from the environment.
Aim: In this review, we aimed to examine the theoretical point of contact between phenomenology and computational neuroscience from the perspective of inferential processing within the frontal–striatal–thalamic circuit. An imbalance within this circuit may disrupt inferential processes that minimize discrepancies between internal models and latent states. Such maladaptive inferential processes may distort subjective experiences, potentially contributing to the symptoms observed in At-Risk Mental States (ARMS) and Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome (APS), which are considered clinically high-risk states for psychosis. Based on these considerations, we propose a model linking psychopathological phenomena and neurobiological alterations through the dysfunction of the frontal–striatal–thalamic circuit and associated disturbances in inferential processing. We assessed whether this model was theoretically consistent with previous findings and our own longitudinal studies on ARMS/APS.
Conclusions: This conceptual model may provide a novel perspective on the information-processing mechanisms, particularly inferential processing, and their alterations across high-risk clinical states for psychosis, including ARMS/APS and broader Clinical High At Risk Mental States (CHARMS) concept.
Citations in the library
Cites 6
- Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 2003
- The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis. Biological Psychiatry May 25, 2018
- What are the neurocognitive correlates of basic self-disturbance in schizophrenia?: Integrating phenomenology and neurocognition. Part 1 (Source monitoring deficits). Schizophrenia Research January 2014
- What are the neurocognitive correlates of basic self-disturbance in schizophrenia? Integrating phenomenology and neurocognition: Part 2 (aberrant salience). Schizophrenia Research January 2014
- The Computational Anatomy of Psychosis Frontiers in Psychiatry April 25, 2013
and 1 more in the library