A Failed Phenomenology: Anthony Steinbock's Logical Errors
Aleksandar Fatić
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) June 29, 2026 DOI: 10.13140/rg.2.2.15535.91043 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Philosophy of mind |
| Key points | Argues that Anthony J. Steinbock's phenomenological programme commits three characteristic logical pitfalls: contradiction in claiming affective states both have Husserlian Evidenz and exceed the intentional framework defining it; a category error in applying transcendental constitution to the always-already of cultural situatedness; and circular reasoning in presenting the vertical/horizontal distinction as a phenomenological discovery when it was presupposed as an interpretive framework. The author contends these failures are not correctable within the programme. |
Abstract
Phenomenological epistemologies of moral and religious experience face a small number of characteristic logical pitfalls whose consequences, when they are not avoided, ramify through an entire programme. Three such pitfalls are examined in this paper through their systematic exemplification in the work of Anthony J. Steinbock, whose programme spanning Moral Emotions (2014), Phenomenology and Mysticism (2007), and Home and Beyond (1995) commits all three with a consistency that makes the programme instructive precisely as a cautionary case. The first pitfall is contradiction: claiming that affective states have their own kind of Husserlian Evidenz whilst simultaneously claiming that they exceed the intentional framework within which Evidenz is defined and functions; the two claims are mutually exclusive, and Steinbock’s own phenomenological descriptions of the moral emotions demonstrate that the emotions operate within the intentional framework rather than beyond it, so that the programme is refuted by its own descriptive evidence. The second pitfall is a category error: applying the vocabulary of transcendental constitution to the always-already of cultural situatedness, whose ontological character is precisely that it precedes any constituting activity; Husserl’s lifeworld analysis in the Crisis, far from providing relief, reconfirms that the constituting/constituted correlation remains operative at every level of the Husserlian framework. The third pitfall is circular reasoning: importing the vertical/horizontal distinction as the interpretive framework within which mystical testimonies are read, finding the distinction in the testimonies so read, and presenting it as a phenomenological discovery; the corollary of the circularity is that no phenomenological work is done by the analysis, since the conclusion was already present in the premises. The paper demonstrates all three failures from Steinbock’s own texts and shows that they are not correctable within the programme that commits them.
Comparable studies
Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. | 2003 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| From dopamine to salience to psychosis--linking biology, pharmacology and phenomenology of psychosis. | 2005 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| How do the brain's time and space mediate consciousness and its different dimensions? Temporo-spatial theory of consciousness (TTC). | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in OCD: an enactive affordance-based model. | 2013 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Looking for the Self: Phenomenology, Neurophysiology and Philosophical Significance of Drug-induced Ego Dissolution | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper |