Skip to content

‘I haven’t fully understood – is shamanism religion or not?’

Olle Sundström

Temenos - Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion July 4, 2018 DOI: 10.33356/temenos.73111 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Historical analysis Peer reviewed
Topics Shamanism
Key points Argues that definitions of 'religion', and decisions about whether something counts as 'religion', depend on social and political circumstances and on whether religion is judged positive or negative for individuals and society. The essay illustrates this through Soviet Marxist-Leninist classifications of indigenous shamanism in the Soviet North and the legal consequences for practitioners in the Far East.

Abstract

In this essay the Marxist-Leninist understanding of the concept ‘religion’ is analysed in relation to how it was applied to the so-called shamanism of the indigenous peoples of the Soviet North. The point of departure is the correspondence between the head of the Council for the Affairs of Religious Cults in the Soviet Far East and his superior in Moscow. Further, the legal consequences of the somewhat varying Soviet understandings of ‘religion’ for people adhering to indigenous worldviews and ritual traditions in the Far East is presented. The essay aims to exemplify how definitions of ‘religion’, as well as the categorising of something as ‘religion’ or not, rely on social and political circumstances, and whether one finds ‘religion’, as well as the entities classified as such, to be positive or negative for the individual and society.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on shamanism, most cited first.

Explore topics