Skip to content

The DSM: mindful science or mindless power? A critical review.

Bassam Khoury, Ellen J. Langer, Francesco Pagnini

Frontiers in Psychology June 17, 2014 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00602 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Pathology Utility Normality Dsm Mindless
Key findings Argues that the DSM's scientific bases and utility are questionable and that it holds excessive influence over psychiatric classification. The authors contend that the boundaries between "normality" and "pathology" are problematic and recommend adding alternative perspectives such as mindfulness and positive psychology, along with mindfulness training in psychiatric residency and clinical psychology programs.

Abstract

In this paper we review the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental health (DSM), its scientific bases and utility. The concepts of "normality," "pathology," and boundaries between them are critically reviewed. We further use the concepts of mindfulness and mindlessness, and evidence from cognitive and social sciences to investigate the DSM clinical and social impact and we argue against its assigned overpower. We recommend including alternative perspectives to the DSM, such as mindfulness and positive psychology. We also argue for including mindfulness training in psychiatric residency and clinical psychology programs.

Comparable studies

Other narrative reviews on meditation, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics