Skip to content

Has the science of mindfulness lost its mind?

Miguel Farias, Catherine Wikholm

BJPsych Bulletin December 2016 DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.116.053686 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Commentary Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Key points Argues that the mindfulness meditation literature lacks conceptual and methodological self-criticism, that responses vary widely with some individuals experiencing no substantive effect or moderate to serious adverse effects, and that evidence for benefits is insufficient or inconclusive, particularly in comparisons with other activities or treatments.

Abstract

The excitement about the application of mindfulness meditation in mental health settings has led to the proliferation of a literature pervaded by a lack of conceptual and methodological self-criticism. In this article we raise two major concerns. First, we consider the range of individual differences within the experience of meditation; although some people may benefit from its practice, others will not be affected in any substantive way, and a number of individuals may suffer moderate to serious adverse effects. Second, we address the insufficient or inconclusive evidence for its benefits, particularly when mindfulness-based interventions are compared with other activities or treatments. We end with suggestions on how to improve the quality of research into mindfulness interventions and outline key issues for clinicians considering referring patients for these interventions.

Citations in the library

Explore topics