Skip to content

Basic self-disturbance, neurocognition and metacognition: A pilot study among help-seeking adolescents with and without attenuated psychosis syndrome.

Dan Koren, Ravit Scheyer, Noa Reznik, Merav Adres, Alan Apter, Josef Parnas, Larry J. Seidman

Early Intervention in Psychiatry October 20, 2017 DOI: 10.1111/eip.12500 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Pilot study Peer reviewed
Sample size 61
Population Non-psychotic, help-seeking adolescents aged 13-18 with and without attenuated psychosis syndrome
Measures Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience, Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes
Keywords Humans Pilot projects Emotions Ego Memory Psychotic disorders Schizophrenia Adolescent Female Executive function Theory of mind Prodromal symptoms Metacognition Neurocognition Prodrome Self-disturbance Attenuated psychosis syndrome
Key points Metacognitive monitoring and control significantly predicted self-disturbance over and above neurocognitive functioning and attenuated psychotic symptoms, but the association was positive rather than negative and was not moderated by attenuated psychosis syndrome. The authors propose this may indicate hyper-reflectivity in individuals with self-disturbance.

Abstract

Aim: The goal of this pilot study was to assess the association between basic self-disturbance (SD) and deficits in neurocognitive and metacognitive functioning among help-seeking adolescents with and without attenuated psychosis syndrome (APS).

Methods: Sixty-one non-psychotic, help-seeking adolescents (age 13-18) were assessed with the examination of anomalous self-experience, the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and a new metacognitive approach to neurocognitive assessment applied to two non-social (executive functions and verbal memory) and two social (theory of mind and emotion recognition) domains. After each answer, subjects were also requested to indicate their level of confidence in the answer and to decide whether they desired it to be "counted" toward their total score on the task. Each volunteered answer earned a 5-cent gain if correct, but an equal fine if wrong.

Results: As hypothesized, metacognitive monitoring and control had a significant contribution to the prediction of SD over and above neurocognitive functioning and attenuated psychotic symptoms. However, the direction of this association was positive rather than negative. Also, inconsistent with or hypothesis, it was not moderated by the presence of APS.

Conclusions: These pilot results provide preliminary support a modest association between SD and metacognition, which is not reducible to neurocognition and APS. In addition, they raise an intriguing possibility regarding metacognitive monitoring and control being indicators of hyper-reflectivity that characterizes individuals with SD. However, further research with larger samples and high-stress assessment conditions are needed to assess this possibility.

Citations in the library

Cited by 6

and 1 more in the library

Cites 12

and 7 more in the library

Explore topics