Skip to content

Two theories of consciousness: Semantic pointer competition vs. information integration.

Paul Thagard, Terrence C Stewart

Consciousness and Cognition November 2014 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.07.001 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative Peer reviewed
Keywords Binding Competition Consciousness Information integration Neural engineering framework Neural mechanisms Qualia Representation Semantic pointers
Key points Argues that consciousness is produced by representation via neural firing patterns, binding into "semantic pointers," and competition among those pointers, and contends that this semantic pointer competition theory explains key features of consciousness better than integrated information theory, based on computer simulations.

Abstract

Consciousness results from three mechanisms: representation by firing patterns in neural populations, binding of representations into more complex representations called semantic pointers, and competition among semantic pointers to capture the most important aspects of an organism's current state. We contrast the semantic pointer competition (SPC) theory of consciousness with the hypothesis that consciousness is the capacity of a system to integrate information (IIT). We describe computer simulations to show that SPC surpasses IIT in providing better explanations of key aspects of consciousness: qualitative features, onset and cessation, shifts in experiences, differences in kinds across different organisms, unity and diversity, and storage and retrieval.

Citations in the library