Skip to content

Panpsychism and Priority Cosmopsychism

Yujin Nagasawa, Khai Wager

Oxford University Press eBooks October 20, 2016 DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199359943.003.0005 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 79
Key points Argues that "priority cosmopsychism"—combining Schafferian priority monism with the claim that the cosmos as a whole is phenomenally propertied—is theoretically more advantaged than classical micropanpsychism, while acknowledging problems of cosmic consciousness's inexplicability, counterintuitiveness, and estrangement from science.

Abstract

This chapter explicates a version of holistic panpsychism, “priority cosmopsychism,” which is understood as a holistic alternative to classical micropanpsychism. Priority cosmopsychism inherits the idea that there is—ontologically speaking—the whole as well as its respective parts from Schafferian priority monism. Despite this quasi-realistic concept of the respective parts, priority monists claim that the whole is fundamental in the sense that the parts are dependent on or derivative of the whole. To this is added a panpsychistic foundation: the cosmos as a whole is mentally—and in particular ‘phenomenally’—propertied. The chapter asserts that priority cosmopsychism is theoretically more advantaged than panpsychism. They conclude their paper discussing some problems exclusive to Priority Cosmopsychism: the inexplicability of a cosmic consciousness, counterintuitiveness, and the seeming estrangement from science.

Citations in the library

Explore topics