Differential effects of acute amphetamine and phencyclidine treatment and withdrawal from repeated amphetamine or phencyclidine treatment on social interaction and social memory in rats
Ming Li, Wei He, Rebecca Munro
PsyCh Journal June 1, 2012 DOI: 10.1002/pchj.8 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Animal experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Male Sprague-Dawley rats |
| Interventions | Amphetamine Phencyclidine |
| Dose | AMPH 1.5 mg/kg sc (acute); PCP 2.0 mg/kg sc (acute); AMPH 3.0 mg/kg/day for 7 days ip (repeated); PCP 5.0 mg/kg/twice daily for 7 days ip (repeated) |
| Duration | Acute experiments: testing on two consecutive days; repeated treatment: 7 days followed by withdrawal |
| Key findings | Acute AMPH (1.5 mg/kg) reduced social interaction time but only disrupted social recognition on the second day, while acute PCP (2.0 mg/kg) disrupted social recognition on both days without affecting social interaction time. Withdrawal from repeated AMPH or PCP treatment had no effect on either measure. The authors suggest acute low-dose AMPH may model social withdrawal and acute PCP may model social cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. |
Abstract
Abstract: Although animal models based on amphetamine (AMPH) or phencyclidine (PCP) treatment have been used extensively to study the neurobiological and behavioral characteristics of schizophrenia, there are conflicting reports regarding their validity in modeling the negative symptoms and cognitive deficits of schizophrenia. The present study examined how acute AMPH or PCP treatment (Experiment 1) and withdrawal from repeated AMPH treatment (Experiment 2) or PCP treatment (Experiment 3) affects social behavior and social recognition memory in male Sprague‐Dawley rats. Each subject was tested on two consecutive days. On the first day, the rats were tested four times (5 min/each) at 10‐min intervals with the same partner rat (termed “AAAA” day). One day later, the rats were tested with the previous partner in the first three sessions and with a new partner rat in the final session (termed “AAAB” day). The results show that acute AMPH treatment (1.5 mg/kg, sc) significantly reduced the time spent on social interaction, but did not affect social recognition on the first day. Acute AMPH only disrupted social recognition on the second day of drug testing. In contrast, acute PCP treatment (2.0 mg/kg, sc) had no effect on time spent on social interaction, but did significantly disrupt social recognition on both days. Withdrawal from repeated AMPH (3.0 mg/kg/day for 7 days, ip) or PCP (5.0 mg/kg/twice daily for 7 days, ip) treatment did not affect social interaction or social recognition, indicating a lack of long‐term detrimental effect of repeated AMPH or PCP treatment. These results suggest that acute AMPH treatment at a low dose (1.5 mg/kg) may be useful in modeling social withdrawal symptoms of schizophrenia, whereas acute PCP treatment at a similar dose range (2.0 mg/kg) may be useful in modeling the social cognitive deficit of schizophrenia.
Citations in the library
Cites 4
- Effects of Subchronic Phencyclidine (PCP) Treatment on Social Behaviors, and Operant Discrimination and Reversal Learning in C57BL/6J Mice. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 2009
- Spatial memory deficits induced by perinatal treatment of rats with PCP and reversal effect of D-serine. Neuropsychopharmacology June 1, 2004
- Phencyclidine in the social interaction test: an animal model of schizophrenia with face and predictive validity. Reviews in the Neurosciences 1999
- Effects of continuous D-amphetamine and phencyclidine administration on social behaviour, stereotyped behaviour, and locomotor activity in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology July 1, 1998