Skip to content

Shamanism in Contemporary Norway: Concepts in Conflict

Trude Fonneland

Religions July 23, 2018 DOI: 10.3390/rel9070223 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Shamanism
Key points Argues that shamanic practitioners in Norway largely reject the term 'religion' for their practices, preferring broader categories, and that the Norwegian government's 2012 approval of shamanism as an official religion intensified tensions because many shamans refused this connection. The chapter documents the emic categories and connections these practitioners use and examines the advantages and disadvantages of the term 'religion' as deployed on the ground.

Abstract

To choose a terminology for an investigation of shamanism in contemporary Norway is not entirely without problems. Many shamans are adamant in rejecting the term religion in connection with their practices and choose broader rubrics when describing what they believe in. When shamanism was approved as an official religion by the Norwegian government in 2012, the tensions ran high, and many shamanic practitioners refused to accept the connection between religion and shamanism. This chapter provides an account of the emic categories and connections used today by shamanic entrepreneurs and others who share these types of spiritual beliefs. In particular, the advantages and disadvantages of the term religion and how it is deployed on the ground by shamans in Norway will be highlighted.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on shamanism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics