Skip to content

Embodied Cognition and Perception: Dewey, Science and Skepticism

Matthew Crippen

Contemporary Pragmatism May 30, 2017 DOI: 10.1163/18758185-01401007 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Argues that Dewey's account of perception and cognition, informed by the sciences of his day and anticipating enactive cognitive science, repudiates Modern theories of mind that persist even in materialist, anti-dualist views, and thereby combats skepticism suggesting humans lack genuine access to reality.

Abstract

This article examines how Modern theories of mind remain even in some materialistic and hence ontologically anti-dualistic views; and shows how Dewey, anticipating Merleau-Ponty and 4E cognitive scientists, repudiates these theories. Throughout I place Dewey’s thought in the context of scientific inquiry, both recent and historical and including the cognitive as well as traditional sciences; and I show how he incorporated sciences of his day into his thought, while also anticipating enactive cognitive science. While emphasizing Dewey’s continued relevance, my main goal is to show how his scientifically informed account of perception and cognition combats skepticism propagated by certain scientific visions, exacerbated by commonplace notions about mind, that jointly suggest that human beings lack genuine access to reality.

Citations in the library

Explore topics