Skip to content

Piercing of Consciousness as a Threshold-Crossing Operation.

Yul H R Kang, Frederike H Petzschner, Daniel M Wolpert, Michael N Shadlen

Current Biology July 27, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.047 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Experimental perceptual decision-making study Peer reviewed
Sample size 5
Population Human participants making perceptual decisions about dynamic random dot motion
Keywords Humans Consciousness Motion perception Decision making Adult Female Reaction time Mental chronometry
Key findings Subjective decision times were faster on easier, stronger-motion trials and were well fit by a bounded drift-diffusion model; for four of five participants, parameters fitted to subjective decision times alone fully predicted choice accuracy. The authors argue this indicates subjective reports correspond to the terminating threshold of evidence accumulation rather than a post hoc inference.

Abstract

Many decisions arise through an accumulation of evidence to a terminating threshold. The process, termed bounded evidence accumulation (or drift diffusion), provides a unified account of decision speed and accuracy, and it is supported by neurophysiology in human and animal models. In many situations, a decision maker may not communicate a decision immediately and yet feel that at some point she had made up her mind. We hypothesized that this occurs when an accumulation of evidence reaches a termination threshold, registered, subjectively, as an "aha" moment. We asked human participants to make perceptual decisions about the net direction of dynamic random dot motion. The difficulty and viewing duration were controlled by the experimenter. After indicating their choice, participants adjusted the setting of a clock to the moment they felt they had reached a decision. The subjective decision times (tSDs) were faster on trials with stronger (easier) motion, and they were well fit by a bounded drift-diffusion model. The fits to the tSDs alone furnished parameters that fully predicted the choices (accuracy) of four of the five participants. The quality of the prediction provides compelling evidence that these subjective reports correspond to the terminating process of a decision rather than a post hoc inference or arbitrary report. Thus, conscious awareness of having reached a decision appears to arise when the brain's representation of accumulated evidence reaches a threshold or bound. We propose that such a mechanism might play a more widespread role in the "piercing of consciousness" by non-conscious thought processes.

Citations in the library

Explore topics