Seemings and Defeat by Disagreement in the Case of Religious Experience
R. Douglas Geivett
Philosophia Christi 2023 DOI: 10.5840/pc202325218 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that granting the epistemic weight of seemings in religious experience may imply that religious experience is practically universal, and that the private character of these seemings defeats the alleged defeat of justification for religious belief arising from peer disagreement. |
Abstract
Exploiting the resources of phenomenal conservatism, Harold Netland has offered a “critical-trust” approach to assessing the veridicality of religious experience and to ascertaining its evidential force in relation to Christian theistic belief. I suggest that, if we give seemings carried in religious experience their epistemic due, it may turn out that religious experience is practically universal and that the potential defeat of justification for religious belief by disagreement among purported epistemic peers is itself defeated by the private character of seemings in the religious experiences of believers.