Transformative Experience and the Problem of Religious Disagreement
Joshua Blanchard, L.A. Paul
Religious Disagreement and Pluralism November 30, 2021 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198849865.003.0006 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that the transformative nature of religious experience intensifies the epistemological problem of peer disagreement over religion by adding a new dimension: transitioning between belief and skepticism involves becoming a different self, and we can lack epistemic and affective access to our potential religious, agnostic, or skeptical selves. Such access seems required for decision-making that is both rational and authentic, which bears on the epistemic status of religious conversion and deconversion. |
Abstract
Abstract: Chapter 6 considers how peer disagreement over religion presents an epistemological problem: How can confidence in any religious claims including their negations be epistemically justified? Here, it is shown that the transformative nature of religious experience poses a further problem: to transition between religious belief and skepticism is not just to adopt a different set of beliefs, but to transform into a different version of oneself. It is argued that this intensifies the problem of pluralism by adding a new dimension to religious disagreement, for we can lack epistemic and affective access to our potential religious, agnostic, or skeptical selves. Yet, access to these selves seems to be required for the purposes of decision-making that is to be both rational and authentic. Finally, the chapter reflects on the relationship between the transformative problem and what it shows about the epistemic status of religious conversion and deconversion, in which one disagrees with one’s own transformed self.