The level of mindfulness in interpersonal relationships: The validity and reliability of the assessment scale
Bojan Dučić, Svetlana Kaljača
Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija 2023 DOI: 10.5937/specedreh22-40253 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Psychometric validation study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 114 |
| Population | University students (mean age approximately 20.75 years) |
| Measures | Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale, Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale, Perceived Stress Scale-10 |
| Topics | Meditation |
| Key points | The Interpersonal Mindfulness Scale showed acceptable internal consistency (alpha .69-.88) and moderate-to-high test-retest reliability (ICC .58-.91), and correlated positively with the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (r = .58). Its correlation with the Perceived Stress Scale-10 was not statistically significant. The authors recommend the scale for assessing mindfulness in social interactions. |
Abstract
Introduction. The multidimensional concept of mindfulness includes voluntary attention, focus on the "present moment", monitoring of mental processes, and inhibition of impulsive reactions. Examining the impact of the level of mindfulness on the quality of the relationship between the special educator and the student requires an instrument with satisfactory psychometric characteristics. Objectives. The goal of this research was to determine the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminative validity of the Interpersonal mindfulness scale. Methods. The reliability of the Interpersonal mindfulness scale was checked by calculating Cronbach's Alpha in a sample of 114 students (age: M = 20.75, SD = 2.20). For the test-retest reliability check, a sample of 32 students was formed (age: M = 21.41, SD = 2.46). The relationship between the Interpersonal mindfulness scale and the Cognitive and affective mindfulness scale was determined in a sample of 59 students (age: M = 20.93, SD = 1.92). For examining the Pearson correlations of the Interpersonal mindfulness scale and the Perceived Stress Scale-10, the sample included 55 students (age: M = 20.55, SD = 2.47). Results. It was determined that the values of the internal consistency of the Interpersonal mindfulness scale and its subscales were acceptable (a = .69 - .88), the level of test-retest reliability was moderate to high (ICC = .58 -.91), the correlation with the overall results of the Cognitive and affective mindfulness scale was statistically significant and positive (r = .58, p < .001), while it was not statistically significant (p > .05) on the Perceived Stress Scale-10. Conclusion. Based on the established reliability and validity, the Interpersonal mindfulness scale can be recommended as an instrument for obtaining reliable data on the quality and level of mindfulness manifested in social interactions
Citations in the library
Cites 7
- The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003
- Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Assessment January 27, 2006
- Assessment of Mindfulness by Self-Report Assessment September 1, 2004
- The toronto mindfulness scale: Development and validation Journal of Clinical Psychology 2006
- Examining the Occurrence and Clinical Impact of Difficult Experiences that Emerge during a Mindfulness-Based Intervention among Individuals at High-Risk of Suicide. Mindfulness June 18, 2024
and 2 more in the library