Skip to content

The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS): A process measure for evaluating mindfulness-based interventions.

Michael J Li, David S Black, Eric L Garland

Personality and Individual Differences April 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.027 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Scale development and validation study (mixed qualitative-quantitative, three independent studies) Peer reviewed
Sample size 322
Population Mindfulness practitioners (participants in cognitive interviews, scale validation, and replication samples)
Measures Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS)
Topics Meditation
Keywords Scale Validation Coping Psychometric Process measure Mindfulness-based intervention
Key findings The Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS) was developed as a 15-item measure of how practitioners apply mindfulness to remediate psychological suffering. Cognitive interviewing yielded a comprehensible scale; exploratory factor analysis suggested three factors (decentering, positive emotion regulation, negative emotion regulation); and confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample indicated better fit for the three-factor structure than a one-factor structure. The authors propose AMPS as a process measure for mindfulness-based interventions and general practice.

Abstract

Objective: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) include the application of meditation and mind-body practices used to promote mindful awareness in daily life. Operationalizing the construct of mindfulness is important in order to determine mechanisms of therapeutic change elicited by mindfulness practice. In addition to existing state and trait measures of mindfulness, process measures are needed to assess the ways in which individuals apply mindfulness in the context of their practice.

Method: This report details three independent studies (qualitative interview, N = 8; scale validation, N = 134; and replication study, N = 180) and the mixed qualitative-quantitative methodology used to develop and validate the Applied Mindfulness Process Scale (AMPS), a 15-item process measure designed to quantify how mindfulness practitioners actively use mindfulness to remediate psychological suffering in their daily lives.

Results: In Study 1, cognitive interviewing yielded a readily comprehensible and accessible scale of 15 items. In Study 2, exploratory factor analysis derived a potential three-factor solution: decentering, positive emotion regulation, and negative emotion regulation. In Study 3, confirmatory factor analysis verified better model fit with the three-factor structure over the one-factor structure.

Conclusions: AMPS functions as a measure to quantify the application of mindfulness and processes of change in the context of MBIs and general mindfulness practice.

Comparable studies

Other qualitative studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
The varieties of contemplative experience: A mixed-methods study of meditation-related challenges in Western Buddhists Western Buddhist meditation practitioners and experts in Theravāda, Zen, and Tibetan... 2017 Qualitative study with mixed-methods
The Effects of Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction on Nurse Stress and Burnout Nurses in a hospital system 2004 Implementation study with mixed methods
An exploratory mixed methods study of the acceptability and effectiveness of mindfulness -based cognitive therapy for patients with active depression and anxiety in primary care Primary care patients with recurrent depression or recurrent depression and anxiety 2006 Exploratory mixed methods study n = 13
A qualitative study of mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy for depression Participants in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in a mental-health context 2001 Qualitative study n = 7
Effortless awareness: using real time neurofeedback to investigate correlates of posterior cingulate cortex activity in meditators' self-report Meditators 2013 Qualitative study using grounded theory methodology

Citations in the library

Cited by 22

and 17 more in the library

Cites 33

and 28 more in the library

Explore topics