Skip to content

Does mindfulness improve one’s affective state? Temporal associations between trait mindfulness and positive and negative affect

Paul E. Jose, Anna Geiserman

Current Psychology August 24, 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s12144-023-04999-y (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Longitudinal observational study Cross-sectional Peer reviewed
Sample size 319
Population Community adults
Duration 3 months, with measurements at three time points separated by three months each
Measures Five Facet Mindfulness Measure (FFMQ), positive affect, negative affect
Topics Meditation
Citations 10
Key findings Trait mindfulness, assessed with the Five Facet Mindfulness Measure, predicted a decrease in negative affect over three months but did not predict an increase in positive affect. Negative affect also predicted decreases in overall mindfulness, suggesting a reciprocal relationship, and all five mindfulness facets predicted reductions in negative affect, while negative affect predicted reductions in three facets: non-reacting, acting with awareness, and describing.

Abstract

Abstract Although cross-sectional and daily diary studies have noted associations among trait mindfulness and positive and negative affect, lacking are studies that longitudinally examine these relationships over a period of months. We tested whether trait mindfulness (assessed with the Five Facet Mindfulness Measure) predicted an increase in positive affect and a decrease in negative affect across 3 months. A sample of 319 community adults completed self-report measures of mindfulness, positive affect, and negative affect at three times of measurement separated by three months each. As hypothesised, overall mindfulness, tested with a random intercepts cross-lag path model, predicted over three months a decrease in negative affect, but, contrary to predictions, did not predict an increase in positive affect. In the reverse direction, within-subject negative affect predicted decreases of overall within-subject mindfulness, which suggests that this relationship may be reciprocal over time. When examined at the facet level of mindfulness, all five within-subject facets of the FFMQ predicted reductions in within-subject negative affect over time. In return, within-subject negative affect predicted reductions in three within-subject mindfulness facets: non-reacting, acting with awareness, and describing. On balance, the results of this study suggest that trait mindfulness, as assessed with the FFMQ, was much more successful in predicting diminished negative affect than in predicting a boost in positive affect. Further, the presence of negative affect seems to exert an inhibiting influence over time on the implementation of several mindfulness facets.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Undergraduate students 2006 Observational cohort
Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders Patients with generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder with or without agoraphobia 1992 Observational cohort n = 22
Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness Participants with extensive Insight meditation experience and matched controls 2005 Observational cohort n = 20
Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity Experienced meditators and matched meditation-naive controls 2011 Observational cohort
Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice Long-term Buddhist practitioners and controls 2004 Observational cohort

Citations in the library

Explore topics