The Ethics of Uncertainty
L. Syd M Johnson
November 1, 2021 DOI: 10.1093/med/9780190943646.001.0001 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key points | Johnson argues that epistemic and ethical uncertainty in disorders of consciousness interact to create epistemic and ethical risks, and challenges longstanding bioethical dogmas about DoC patients. Johnson proposes an "ethics of uncertainty" that deemphasizes contested personhood and emphasizes inductive risk, respect for autonomy, and epistemic justice, with applications beyond brain injury. |
Abstract
Abstract: Disorders of consciousness (DoCs) raise difficult and complex questions about the value of life for persons with impaired consciousness, the rights of persons unable to make medical decisions, and our social, medical, and ethical obligations to patients whose personhood has frequently been challenged and neglected. Recent neuroscientific discoveries have led to enhanced understanding of the heterogeneity of these disorders and patients, and focused renewed attention on the disturbingly high rate of misdiagnosis. This book examines the entanglement of epistemic and ethical uncertainty in DoCs and other medical contexts, and how they interact to create both epistemic and ethical risks. Philosopher and bioethicist L. Syd M Johnson pulls together multiple threads—the ontological mysteries of consciousness, medical uncertainty about unconsciousness, ableist bias, withdrawal of treatment in neurointensive care, and the rarely questioned view that consciousness is essential to personhood and moral status. Johnson challenges longstanding bioethical dogmas about DoC patients, and argues for an ethics of uncertainty for contexts where there is a need for decisive action in the presence of unavoidable uncertainty. The ethics of uncertainty refocuses ethical inquiry concerning persons with DoCs, placing less emphasis on their contested personhood, and more on inductive risk and uncertainty, on respect for autonomy, and especially on epistemic justice, and the duties of privileged epistemic agents. It is an approach with applications beyond brain injury, encouraging an expansive and humane approach that enables surrogate decision makers facing fraught, complex, risky choices to fulfill their obligations as moral and epistemic agents.
Citations in the library
Cites 12
- On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 1995
- Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State Science September 7, 2006
- Are There Levels of Consciousness? Trends in Cognitive Sciences April 22, 2016
- A common neural code for similar conscious experiences in different individuals Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences September 15, 2014
- Moral significance of phenomenal consciousness. Progress in Brain Research 2009
and 7 more in the library