Subliminal perception is continuous with conscious vision and can be predicted from prestimulus electroencephalographic activity.
Henry Railo, Roberto Piccin, Karolina M Lukasik
European Journal of Neuroscience August 2021 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15354 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Human participants performing a visual discrimination task |
| Keywords | EEG Blindsight Consciousness Cortical excitability Oscillations Prestimulus Subliminal perception Unconscious perception |
| Key findings | Participants discriminated the location of a briefly presented low-contrast stimulus slightly above chance even when they reported not seeing it. Signal detection analyses indicated this capacity lay on the same continuum as conscious vision, and discrimination accuracy was predicted with relatively high accuracy (AUC = 0.70) from prestimulus lateralized EEG activity, stimulus hemifield, and previous-trial accuracy. The authors argue that subliminal perception is based on similar processes as conscious vision rather than being a separate unconscious capacity. |
Abstract
Individuals are able to discriminate visual stimuli they report not consciously seeing. This phenomenon is known as "subliminal perception." Such capacity is often assumed to be relatively automatic in nature and rely on stimulus-driven activity in low-level cortical areas. Instead, here we asked to what extent neural activity before stimulus presentation influences subliminal perception. We asked participants to discriminate the location of a briefly presented low-contrast visual stimulus and then rate how well they saw the stimulus. Consistent with previous studies, participants correctly discriminated with slightly above chance-level accuracy the location of a stimulus they reported not seeing. Signal detection analyses indicated that while subjects categorized their percepts as "unconscious," their capacity to discriminate these stimuli lay on the same continuum as conscious vision. We show that the accuracy of discriminating the location of a subliminal stimulus could be predicted with relatively high accuracy (AUC = 0.70) based on lateralized electroencephalographic (EEG) activity before the stimulus, the hemifield where the stimulus was presented, and the accuracy of previous trial's discrimination response. Altogether, our results suggest that rather than being a separate unconscious capacity, subliminal perception is based on similar processes as conscious vision.
Citations in the library
Cites 13
- ERP and MEG correlates of visual consciousness: The second decade. Consciousness and Cognition April 1, 2020
- Distinct cortical codes and temporal dynamics for conscious and unconscious percepts Elife May 5, 2021
- Causal manipulation of feed-forward and recurrent processing differentially affects measures of consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness September 7, 2020
- Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance. eNeuro 2017
- Awareness-related activity in prefrontal and parietal cortices in blindsight reflects more than superior visual performance. Neuroimage September 15, 2011
and 8 more in the library