Subliminal stimulation and somatosensory signal detection.
Elisa Raffaella Ferrè, Maneesh Sahani, Patrick Haggard
Acta Psychologica October 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.009 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Intervention | Subliminal somatosensory stimulation |
| Keywords | Consciousness Gain control Signal detection theory Signal/noise ratio Somatosensory detection Subliminal stimulation |
| Key findings | Subliminal somatosensory stimulation decreased detection sensitivity for a subsequent somatosensory input, largely through increased false alarm rates, and this effect spread across digits of the same hand. The authors argue that subliminal stimuli temporarily reduce input gain, and that this gain control may be automatic and precede discriminative classification of inputs into signals or noise. |
Abstract
Only a small fraction of sensory signals is consciously perceived. The brain's perceptual systems may include mechanisms of feedforward inhibition that protect the cortex from subliminal noise, thus reserving cortical capacity and conscious awareness for significant stimuli. Here we provide a new view of these mechanisms based on signal detection theory, and gain control. We demonstrated that subliminal somatosensory stimulation decreased sensitivity for the detection of a subsequent somatosensory input, largely due to increased false alarm rates. By delivering the subliminal somatosensory stimulus and the to-be-detected somatosensory stimulus to different digits of the same hand, we show that this effect spreads across the sensory surface. In addition, subliminal somatosensory stimulation tended to produce an increased probability of responding "yes", whether the somatosensory stimulus was present or not. Our results suggest that subliminal stimuli temporarily reduce input gain, avoiding excessive responses to further small inputs. This gain control may be automatic, and may precede discriminative classification of inputs into signals or noise. Crucially, we found that subliminal inputs influenced false alarm rates only on blocks where the to-be-detected stimuli were present, and not on pre-test control blocks where they were absent. Participants appeared to adjust their perceptual criterion according to a statistical distribution of stimuli in the current context, with the presence of supraliminal stimuli having an important role in the criterion-setting process. These findings clarify the cognitive mechanisms that reserve conscious perception for salient and important signals.
Citations in the library
Cites 3
- What Is a Neural Correlate of Consciousness? The MIT Press eBooks October 25, 2002
- Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron April 28, 2011
- Consciousness and the structure of neuronal representations. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences November 1, 1998