From non-conscious processing to conscious events: a minimalist approach.
Asael Y Sklar, Rasha Kardosh, Ran R. Hassin
Neuroscience of Consciousness 2021 DOI: 10.1093/nc/niab026 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Function of consciousness Nonconscious processes Selection for consciousness |
| Key points | Proposes a three-principle "minimalist" framework in which cognitive processes are inherently non-conscious, non-conscious processes prioritize information for conscious experience, and conscious events are sequences of conscious contents and non-conscious processes whose duration affects processing opportunity. Argues that the narrowness of consciousness solves the problem of channeling many non-conscious processes into largely serial action and communication, and identifies stimulus strength, motivational relevance, and mental accessibility as key prioritization factors. |
Abstract
The minimalist approach that we develop here is a framework that allows to appreciate how non-conscious processing and conscious contents shape human cognition, broadly defined. It is composed of three simple principles. First, cognitive processes are inherently non-conscious, while their inputs and (interim) outputs may be consciously experienced. Second, non-conscious processes and elements of the cognitive architecture prioritize information for conscious experiences. Third, conscious events are composed of series of conscious contents and non-conscious processes, with increased duration leading to more opportunity for processing. The narrowness of conscious experiences is conceptualized here as a solution to the problem of channeling the plethora of non-conscious processes into action and communication processes that are largely serial. The framework highlights the importance of prioritization for consciousness, and we provide an illustrative review of three main factors that shape prioritization-stimulus strength, motivational relevance and mental accessibility. We further discuss when and how this framework (i) is compatible with previous theories, (ii) enables new understandings of established findings and models, and (iii) generates new predictions and understandings.
Citations in the library
Cited by 4
- Panpsychism and dualism in the science of consciousness. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews October 1, 2024
- Self-Experience and the Unconscious July 1, 2022
- Individual differences in prioritization for consciousness and the conscious detection of changes. Consciousness and Cognition March 1, 2025
- The Role of the Brain in Individuation Journal of Analytical Psychology April 27, 2025
Cites 37
- Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State Science September 7, 2006
- An information integration theory of consciousness BMC Neuroscience November 2, 2004
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- Consciousness as Integrated Information: a Provisional Manifesto Biological Bulletin December 1, 2008
- Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences December 1, 2007
and 32 more in the library